Skip to content
Marsanne Studio
← The AI watch

Case study ·

Why Michelin switched off GitHub Copilot's Auto mode

Original title, in French: “Pourquoi Michelin a coupé le mode Auto de GitHub Copilot”

Publication
Silicon.fr (France)
Author
Clément Bohic
Published on
21 September 2026 · read in the page structured data · updated on 22 September 2026

Summary

Michelin details an experiment conducted on around 700 requests to evaluate GitHub Copilot's Auto mode, which automatically selects an AI model using a classifier based on four criteria. The company found that this classifier analyses words rather than the actual context of tasks, leading to a model choice that is sometimes random and to large cost differences (from 0.23 to 3.24 credits for the same request). Michelin also shows that the 10% discount promised by GitHub does not always offset the additional cost of Auto mode, notably in chat sessions. The company considers that a cheaper model (GPT Luna) delivers equivalent results for single tasks, and describes Auto mode as a "safety net" rather than a source of savings. An experimental orchestrator, HydraFusion, proves significantly more expensive.

Summary based on the full text of the article.

Read the article on Silicon.fr →

Figures cited

  • 0.23 credit

    Cost of a variable renaming request with MAI-Flash

    Michelin test on GitHub Copilot

    « Avec le premier, il en a coûté 0,23 crédit. »
  • 3.24 credit

    Cost of a variable renaming request with GPT-5.6 Terra

    Michelin test on GitHub Copilot

    « Avec le second, 3,24. »
  • 11.9 %

    Average Auto mode discount with the same model (Claude Sonnet 5)

    6 requests tested by Michelin

    « sur 6 requêtes, 11,9 % moins cher en moyenne »
  • 13.7 credit

    Average cost of a chat session opened with a difficult question

    Michelin test, 7-turn sessions

    « pour un coût moyen de 13,7 crédits »
  • 0.78 credit

    Average cost of a chat session opened with a simple question

    Michelin test, 7-turn sessions

    « pour un coût moyen de 0,78 crédit »
  • 28 credit

    Additional cost of HydraFusion compared with Auto mode for a cascading task

    Michelin test, HydraFusion vs Auto mode

    « Il en a coûté 16 et 28 crédits, là où le mode Auto en aurait consommé 3. »

Classification

Country
France
Company size
Large companies
Industries
Industry and manufacturing · Software vendors, IT services companies, telecoms
Companies
GitHub (supplier), Michelin (deploys AI)
Keywords
github copilot, generative artificial intelligence, AI costs, software development, model routing, AI optimisation

Entry written by Marsanne Studio from the cited article, with the help of an AI model (claude-sonnet-5). The rights to the article and its illustrations belong to Silicon.fr and its author. Entry translated from French by Claude Sonnet 5.5.